Audits @font-face CSS for proprietary foundry families, desktop-format binaries, renamed OFL families and remote Google Fonts hotlinks - the questions a webfont licence audit letter asks. Runs entirely in your browser — nothing is uploaded.
Same engine as the VS Code extension, byte for byte.
This page is the working piece. The full pack has everything below.
The 12 licence questions a foundry audit letter asks, run against your CSS
LG Muenchen I, 3 O 17493/20, 2022-01-20: 100 euro damages to one visitor for a remote Google Fonts call; a solicitor's reply bills by the hour.
Buy the full version — $29It reads every .css, .scss and .less file in your workspace, parses each @font-face block, and reports webfont licence risks with a rule id, a severity and a line number. Twelve rules cover the declared font-family, every src url including base64 data URIs, remote font hosts in @import lines, and whether the stylesheet carries a licence line at all.
Front-end developers and agency teams shipping websites into the EU and the UK, especially anyone who inherited a stylesheet whose font stack nobody can name a licence for. It is written for the moment a foundry audit letter or a German Google-Fonts warning letter lands and somebody has to answer it with file names and line numbers.
A language model can recite the SIL Open Font License, but it cannot see the four @import lines and the five @font-face blocks in the stylesheet you are shipping tonight, and it will not hand you line numbers. Generic CSS linters check syntax and performance; none of them hold a list of foundry families or the OFL Reserved Font Name clause.
Free, with no key: the entire scan across the whole workspace, every finding, every line number, all twelve rules. Nothing is hidden or counted down. The full version adds a different job - exporting that finding list as a dated FONT-LICENSE-AUDIT.md plus a CSV evidence pack you own, keep, and hand to an auditor or your legal team.
A solicitor reading one stylesheet's font stack and writing the reply to a warning letter bills by the hour. For scale, on 2022-01-20 the Landgericht München I decided case 3 O 17493/20 and awarded a single visitor 100 euro because a site fetched a font from fonts.googleapis.com. That is one visitor, on one ground, from one line of CSS.
One question, answered by the person who built it. Your email only if you want the answer sent.